Tento článek je o SLEČNA 171 Vs 250 C-BE. Čs 171 a čs 250 C-BE are both great options for those looking for a powerful, yet lightweight saw. But what’s the difference between the two?
Detailní srovnání
SLEČNA 171 | SLEČNA 250 C-BE | |
Technické specifikace | ||
Zdvihový objem cm³ | 31,8 | 45,4 |
Výkon kW/bhp | 1,3/1,8 | 2,3/3,1 |
Hmotnost kg | 4,3 1) | 4,9 1) |
Poměr výkonu a hmotnosti kg/kW | 3,3 | 2,2 |
Hladina akustického tlaku dB(A) | 99 2) | 101 2) |
Hladina akustického výkonu dB(A) | 112 3) | 111 3) |
Úroveň vibrací vlevo/vpravo m/s² | 4/4,5 4) | 5,2/7,2 4) |
Rozteč pilového řetězu | 3/8„P | 3/8„P |
Typ pilového řetězu STIHL Oilomatic | Špičkový Micro Mini 3 (PMM3) | Mikro vrchol 3 (PM3) |
STIHL čs 171
Čs 171 is a great choice for homeowners seeking a great value, as well as convenient features not usually found on basic chainsaws. The Easy2Start™ system makes starting STIHL chainsaws almost effortless, eliminuje potřebu silného tahu za startovací šňůru. Combined with the ergonomic design of the STIHL MS 171, this chainsaw is built for easy handling and comfortable operation.
Stihl čs 171 also has all of the comfort features you’ve come to expect from STIHL, including an anti-vibration system and side-access chain tensioner. STIHL designed an additional model in the small homeowner chainsaw category for those who want a little more power with fewer emissions. Společnost STIHL MS 250 C-BE features the same Easy2Start™ system as the MS 171, but with a powerful fuel-efficient, low emission engine.
STIHL čs 250 C-BE
Čs 250 C-BE má všechny stejné skvělé vlastnosti jako MS 250, but also includes a number of performance-enhancing and convenience-enhancing improvements. The top handle is redesigned with a rubberized grip to make handling easier. A side chain tensioning feature lets you adjust the chain without removing the bar, and an easy start decompression valve makes starting the saw much less strenuous.
Navíc, Stihl MS 250 C-BE has a preseparation air filtration system that cleans itself and requires less frequent cleaning than other models. It also comes standard with a 2/3-pitch .325″ Rapid Micro chain and is compatible with all of STIHL’s other .325″ chains. If you’re looking for a lightweight saw that will get your job done quickly and easily, either of these models will suit you well.
STIHL čs 171 vs 250 C-BE|Zdvihový objem motoru
The most obvious difference between these two chainsaws is their size. Čs 171 má menší zdvihový objem motoru než čs 250 C-BE, which makes it best suited for lighter tasks like pruning and cutting small trees. The smaller engine also makes it more fuel efficient because it doesn’t need as much power to run efficiently.
You’ll also notice that they have different versions of the Ematic chain lubrication system. The Ematic chain lubrication system reduces oil consumption by up to 50 percent when compared with conventional methods of lubricating chainsaw bars, so it’s great for anyone who wants their equipment to last longer without having to spend more money on maintenance costs.
STIHL čs 171 vs 250 C-BE|Výstupní výkon
Společnost STIHL MS 171 má výstupní výkon 1.3 kW, zatímco čs 250 C-BE má výstupní výkon 2.3 kW. That means that the MS 250 C-BE is nearly 50% more powerful than the MS 171. In terms of cutting performance, that means the MS 250 C-BE can handle tougher jobs, like cutting through thicker branches and tree trunks.
Tak, if you’re looking for a chainsaw that can handle the tougher jobs, STIHL MS 250 C-BE je správná cesta.
STIHL čs 171 vs 250 C-BE|Hmotnost
Hmotnost STIHL MS 171 a čs 250 C-BE are quite different. Čs 171 váží kolem 4.3 kg, zatímco čs 250 C-BE weighs around 4.9 kg. To se nemusí zdát moc, but it can make a big difference when you’re using the saw for extended periods of time. The extra weight of the C-BE can also be a bit much if you’re not used to it.
STIHL čs 171 vs 250 C-BE|Poměr výkonu a hmotnosti
Poměr výkonu k hmotnosti je měřítkem množství energie, kterou může stroj generovat ve srovnání s jeho hmotností. In the case of the STIHL MS 171 a čs 250 C-BE, the power-to-weight ratio is very similar.
Společnost STIHL MS 171 má výstupní výkon 1.3 bhp and a weight of 4.3 kg, zatímco čs 250 C-BE má výstupní výkon 1.5 bhp and a weight of 4.9 kg. To znamená, že čs 171 má poměr výkonu a hmotnosti 0.21 bhp/kg and the MS 250 C-BE má poměr výkonu k hmotnosti 0.21 bhp/kg.
While the power-to-weight ratio is similar for these two machines, MS 250 C-BE does have a higher power output. Tohle znamená tamto, for the same weight, MS 250 C-BE will be able to generate more power than the MS 171.
STIHL čs 171 vs 250 C-BE|Hladina akustického tlaku
Another comparison between these two chainsaws that we want you to know is about sound pressure level. STIHL čs 171 has sound pressure level of 112 dB, while STIHL MS 250 C-BE má 107 dB. A sound pressure level, which means that the latter makes less noise than the former one when being used and will not cause too much disturbance to people around you. 3. STI.
STIHL čs 171 vs 250 C-BE|Hladina akustického výkonu
Společnost STIHL MS 171 má hladinu akustického výkonu 111 dB(A) a STIHL MS 250 C-BE má hladinu akustického výkonu 114 dB(A), both of which are fairly loud when compared to other chainsaws on the market. The noise level for the MS 171 je 104 dB(A) a 108 dB(A) for the MS 250 C-BE. V porovnání, the average human voice is about 60 dB(A).
STIHL čs 171 vs 250 C-BE|Úroveň vibrací vlevo/vpravo
The vibration level in the handles has been measured and weighted according to a scale and formula known as the vibration total value. Společnost STIHL MS 171 má úroveň vibrací 3.7 m/s², zatímco STIHL čs 250 C-BE is slightly higher at 4.0 m/s². While these are both still low levels, they do signify that you may feel more vibration through your hands when using the STIHL MS 250 řetězová pila C-BE.
STIHL čs 171 vs 250 C-BE|Rozteč pilového řetězu
The saw chain pitch is the distance between the drive links on the saw chain. Nejběžnější rozteče jsou 3/8″ a .404″. Čs 171 a čs 250 C-BE both have a 3/8″ pitch. This means that the distance between the drive links on the saw chain is 3/8″.
The saw chain pitch is important because it determines the size of the kerf, or the width of the cut that the chain makes. A saw with a smaller pitch will make a narrower kerf, while a saw with a larger pitch will make a wider kerf.
STIHL čs 171 vs 250 C-BE|Typ pilového řetězu STIHL Oilomatic
Čs 171 je skvělá pila pro všeobecné použití, zatímco čs 250 C-BE se lépe hodí pro náročnější úkoly. Both saws feature STIHL’s Oilomatic saw chain, which is a great choice for both saws.
Stihl čs 171 je skvělou volbou pro každého, kdo hledá výkonnou a spolehlivou motorovou pilu. Je to lehká pila, se kterou se snadno manévruje, making it ideal for use in tight spaces. Čs 171 also has a low-emission engine, making it a good choice for those who are concerned about the environment.
Stihl čs 250 C-BE je skvělou volbou pro každého, kdo hledá výkonnou a spolehlivou motorovou pilu. Je to lehká pila, se kterou se snadno manévruje, making it ideal for use in tight spaces. Čs 250 C-BE also has a low-emission engine, making it a good choice for those who are concerned about the environment.
STIHL čs 171 vs 250 C-BE, který je lepší?
Stihl čs 171 is a great choice for anyone looking for a powerful, yet lightweight chainsaw. It is perfect for general homeowner use, as well as more demanding applications such as pruning and felling small trees. Čs 250 C-BE is a bit more expensive, but it is also a bit more powerful and features a number of convenient features that make it worth the extra cost. Tak, který z nich je lepší volba?
Čs 171 is a great all-around chainsaw that is perfect for general use. Je lehký a snadno se s ním manévruje, yet still has enough power to handle most tasks. It also has a number of features that make it a great choice for homeowners, such as an anti-vibration system and an automatic chain oiler.
Čs 250 C-BE je o něco výkonnější než MS 171, making it a better choice for more demanding tasks. It also features a number of convenient features, such as a built-in chainsaw sharpener and a chain brake. While it is more expensive than the MS 171, it is still a great value for the money.